OnlyFans vs Fanfix: Which Platfrom is Better For Creators?
Hey there, content creators and fans! Buckle up for a David and Goliath battle – OnlyFans and Unlockd.me. Let’s see which one steals the show,
August 22, 2023
Before we begin, here’s an important list of questions you might want to ask yourself before choosing a platform:
Support and Payout: |
|
Brand Recognition and User Accessibility: |
|
Monetization Features: |
|
Fees |
|
Having these questions in mind is crucial when doing your research!
Now, let’s begin, shall we?
Features and Ease of Use
OnlyFans Or Fansly? Both allow creators to sell exclusive content through subscriptions, pay-per-view (PPVs), and tips, but Fansly provides advanced features like emojis that censor explicit parts of images for free followers and different subscription tiers.
OnlyFans is a well-established platform with a reputation for hosting a wide variety of content, while Fansly, being a newcomer, is still growing and has become a popular choice for adult content creators seeking a more niche environment.
OnlyFans boasts an unparalleled brand recognition, offering a robust platform for creators and subscribers. Conversely, Fansly, despite its innovative features, is still working to establish its brand recognition.
Neither platform has great searchability. Fans are typically driven from the creators’ other social media accounts.
Payment Terms and Earning Potential
The subscription limit on OnlyFans is capped at $50, while Fansly allows creators to set a subscription limit of up to $499.
Payouts on OnlyFans takes up to 7 days after users pay with a minimum withdrawal threshold of $20. Fansly releases payouts also just 7 days after users pay, with the same minimum withdrawal limit.
Both platforms charge a 20% commission fee.
While OnlyFans allows payments through Credit/Debit Card and E-wallets, Fansly accepts Crypto in addition to Credit/Debit Card payments.
What We Like
OnlyFans’ established brand recognition and large user base make it a reliable choice for creators and allows creators to cultivate more personal relationships with their followers, making it a go-to platform for those who excel at personal interactions.
Fansly’s superior features like various subscription tiers and faster payouts provide a competitive edge all while offering excellent creator support, providing personalized care and attention through social media, email, or the website’s help desk.
What We Don’t Like
OnlyFans is known to have stricter content policies and inconsistent support, which could cause difficulties for creators.
While Fansly has advanced features, the platform still lacks the broad user base and brand recognition that OnlyFans enjoys, potentially making it more challenging to gain initial traction.
Fansly’s platform is less personal and more automatic, which might require a bit more effort to convert users.
Both platforms have poor searchability, requiring creators to drive fans from their other social media platforms.
Features and Ease of use
Both OnlyFans and Patreon are subscription-based platforms catering to different genres of content creators. OnlyFans provides the ability to post photos, videos, and messages that are only visible to paying subscribers. It is especially focused on personal interaction and upselling, providing a direct messaging feature. Patreon offers exclusive content to paying subscribers, including not only photos and videos, but also podcasts, music, eBooks, and more. It has a multi-tiered membership system, allowing for different levels of content access.
Payment terms and earning potential
OnlyFans and Patreon take a percentage of creators’ earnings as payment processing fees, with OnlyFans charging a 20% fee and Patreon’s fees ranging from 5-12%. Creators can optimize their earnings by offering exclusive content or merchandise, experimenting with different pricing strategies such as discounts for annual subscriptions or limited-time offers.
What we like
The versatility of OnlyFans and Patreon in terms of content genres is appealing. OnlyFans, originally known for adult content, now caters to industries like fitness, cooking, and beauty but mainly has adult content. Patreon caters to a wide array of creators, from musicians to podcasters to visual artists. Patreon stands out for its detailed metrics and analytics tools, while OnlyFans has a notable direct messaging feature for enhanced fan interaction.
What we don’t like
OnlyFans has high payment processing fees and strict content regulations. Despite its flexibility for adult content, this can be a drawback for some creators. Patreon, despite its lower fees and content diversity, can be challenging for creators trying to gain traction and build a following. It leans more towards mainstream, non-adult content, which can be limiting for certain creators.
Features And Ease Of Use
OnlyFans and Just For Fans both provide platforms for content creators to monetize their work. OnlyFans, established in 2016, is popular among various content creators including fitness, cooking etc but mainly includes adult entertainment. Just For Fans, launched in 2018, specifically targets adult content creators and offers features tailored for them, such as an integrated store for selling physical items. OnlyFans has a more generic user interface accommodating a diverse range of content creators, while Just For Fans offers an interface that’s more streamlined for adult content.
Payment Terms And Earning Potential
OnlyFans takes a 20% commission from creators’ earnings, which is lower than Just For Fans’ 30% commission. However, Just For Fans provides additional revenue streams like tips and store sales. OnlyFans is quicker in processing payments, typically within seven days, whereas Just For Fans might take up to 14 days. Successful creators on OnlyFans, like Mia Khalifa, have earned millions, whereas on Just For Fans, adult performers like Austin Wolf have amassed thousands of subscribers.
What We Like
OnlyFans’ lower commission rate and quicker payment processing are appealing, as is its versatility in accommodating different types of content. This platform also has a larger user base which is advantageous for a wider audience reach. On the other hand, Just For Fans is praised for its focus on the adult entertainment niche and the additional revenue streams it offers through tips and merchandise sales. The platform’s leniency towards adult content gives creators more freedom in the content they can produce.
What We Don’t Like
OnlyFans sometimes limits or cracks down on explicit content due to pressure from payment processors, and has a generic user interface which may not be ideal for adult content creators. Just For Fans takes a higher commission and has slower payment processing. Its narrower focus on adult content can be seen as a limitation for those who want to create or expand into other types of content. Additionally, Just For Fans has a smaller user base compared to OnlyFans, which might limit audience reach.
Features And Ease Of Use
OnlyFans is a well-established platform that allows creators to connect with their fans through a subscription-based model. One of its unique features is automatic watermarking which protects content from theft. Unlockd.me, which is newer and aims to focus on user experience, lacks the watermarking feature but offers a more diverse range of tools including the ability to share free teaser content on profiles to attract subscribers. Furthermore, Unlockd.me incorporates premium videos and video calling with an integrated webcam chat feature, making it a more feature-rich platform.
Payment Terms And Earning Potential
When it comes to earning, Unlockd.me charges a lower fee of 15% compared to OnlyFans’ 20%, allowing creators to retain more of their earnings. In addition, Unlockd.me has a weekly payout schedule with a $100 threshold which is less convenient, compared to OnlyFans’ 7 day $20 payout schedule and threshold. In addition, OnlyFans’ larger user base could translate to a larger audience and potentially higher earnings for creators despite the higher fees and longer payout schedules.
What We Like
Unlockd.me’s innovative features and lower transaction fees make it an appealing choice for creators seeking a fresh platform with more ways to engage with their audience. Its focus on user experience and integrated video chat feature sets it apart. On the other hand, OnlyFans’ established brand recognition and massive user base could be advantageous for creators looking to leverage an already popular platform. Also, OnlyFans’ automatic watermarking feature is crucial for content protection.
What We Don’t Like
OnlyFans has had an unstable relationship with content policies, especially concerning adult content, which creates an air of uncertainty for creators. Its higher transaction fee and longer payout schedules may also be viewed as downsides. On the other side, Unlockd.me, being a newer platform, doesn’t have the same level of brand recognition as OnlyFans, and missing watermarking tools which could be a deal-breaker for creators who are concerned about protecting their content.
Features And Ease Of Use
OnlyFans and ManyVids offer distinct features for content creators. OnlyFans stands out for its sleek platform that fosters personal connections between creators and subscribers through exclusive content and direct messages. It also has a fan subscription model and an 80% payout on earnings. ManyVids, initially a video sales platform, has evolved into a versatile fan page with features like contests, custom videos, and on-site traffic, with payouts ranging between 60-80% based on content type. ManyVids is known for being more inclusive of various niches, while OnlyFans is more streamlined and focuses on exclusive content and personalized interactions.
Payment Terms And Earning Potential
In terms of payment, OnlyFans has a slight edge with a consistent 80% payout rate and a referral program that provides a 5% revenue share across all services. ManyVids’ payouts vary between 60-80%, and its referral program restricts the 5% revenue-share to video sales only. ManyVids, however, provides a model-centric approach with added features, which might be appealing to creators who are looking for more versatility in revenue streams.
What We Like
We appreciate OnlyFans for its higher payout rate and its emphasis on building personal connections between creators and their audience. It’s also noteworthy that OnlyFans has gained mainstream recognition, attracting a broad and diverse user base. ManyVids, on the other hand, is commendable for its built-in traffic and diversity in content types and niches, as well as for its contests and custom video features. This makes it particularly beneficial for creators who want to experiment with different content types and gain visibility without solely relying on external sources like social media.
What We Don’t Like
One drawback of OnlyFans is that it relies heavily on external traffic, meaning creators have to put extra effort into driving traffic to their pages through social media. Additionally, some might find the platform limiting in terms of content diversity. For ManyVids, the lower engagement levels compared to OnlyFans and the variable payout rates, which can be as low as 60%, are concerns. Additionally, ManyVids doesn’t have the same level of mainstream recognition that OnlyFans enjoys, which might be a disadvantage for some creators looking for a wider audience.
Features And Ease Of Use
In comparison, both OnlyFans and Fanvue have a multitude of features to help creators engage with their audience and monetize their content. The platforms provide direct messaging, tipping, and live streaming capabilities. OnlyFans is well established and caters to a wide range of creators, while Fanvue, the newer entrant, provides creators with additional tools such as setting up virtual meet-and-greets. Notably, while OnlyFans is more associated with explicit content, Fanvue maintains strict guidelines against hate speech and promotes a variety of content genres. Despite these differences, both platforms endeavor to ensure the creator and user experience is user-friendly and interactive.
Payment Terms And Earning Potential
Both OnlyFans and Fanvue present viable earning opportunities for creators. On OnlyFans, creators retain 80% of their earnings but must wait 7 days for payouts. Fanvue, however, lures creators with an 85% revenue share in the first three months and decreases to 80% afterward. It also provides a 7 days payout period. OnlyFans has a larger user base, providing potentially higher earnings, Fanvue’s more favorable payment terms may appeal to creators needing quicker access to their funds.
What We Like
There are several aspects to appreciate about both platforms. OnlyFans’ significant user base and brand recognition potentially enable creators to reach a broader audience and monetize their content effectively. Its reputation for hosting unique content also attracts fans willing to pay for such experiences. On the other hand, Fanvue offers a higher initial earnings rate and faster payout times, which are attractive features for creators needing immediate access to their funds. Fanvue’s extra feature, virtual meet-and-greets, provides an additional avenue for creators to interact with their fans, which could enhance their engagement and monetization efforts.
What We Don’t Like
Despite their strengths, both platforms have shortcomings. Although the platform has a larger user base, the association with explicit content could deter creators aiming to produce more wholesome or family-friendly content. Fanvue, as a newer platform, lacks the brand recognition that OnlyFans enjoys. It has a smaller user base, which could limit a creator’s reach and potential earnings. Furthermore, new users might face hurdles in understanding and setting up accounts on Fanvue, posing additional challenges for creators trying to expand their fanbase on this platform.
Features And Ease Of Use
MYM, which stands for Meet Your Model, is a platform akin to OnlyFans where creators can share content behind a paywall through subscriptions. It markets itself as a ‘premium social media’ website. The platform is international but primarily operates in USD. Unlike OnlyFans, MYM targets a more mainstream audience by prominently featuring content from health influencers, models, singers, chefs, and other creatives. It also allows adult content, but it does not promote it. One of the distinguishing features of MYM is the ability for creators to offer personalized content where users can send requests that creators can choose to fulfill or reject. Another notable feature is the default blurring of private content to entice non-subscribers, as opposed to hiding content behind a black box which is common on other platforms. Additionally, MYM has a unique Push media feature that lets creators send content to subscribers and non-subscribers alike, who can then decide to pay to unlock it.
Payment Terms And Earning Potential
MYM generates revenue by taking a percentage from the creator’s earnings. For subscriptions, MYM takes a 25% cut, which is higher compared to the standard 20% that other platforms often charge. For private media, the cut is 20%, and for tips, it’s significantly lower at 10%. However, there’s an additional 7% fee that applies before MYM takes its cut for bank charges. The earnings potential on MYM largely depends on the creator’s social following, activity on the site, and subscription prices. There is a SuperStar program that creators can join to boost earnings. To qualify, a creator must have a certified account, post at least twice a week, respond to 90% of private messages within 48 hours, and have at least 50 active subscribers. Meeting these requirements earns the creator an extra 1% commission and higher visibility in searches.
What We Like
MYM offers a fresh take on content-sharing platforms by targeting a more mainstream audience. The option for creators to offer personalized content based on user requests is particularly appealing, as it adds an element of interaction and customization. The default blurring of private content instead of completely hiding it is an innovative approach that can entice more subscribers. The lower commission on tips (10%) is also advantageous for creators.
What We Don’t Like
The major downside to MYM is the relatively high commission it takes from subscription earnings (25%) compared to other platforms like OnlyFans which charge 20%. Additionally, the 7% fee charged for bank transfers is applied before MYM takes its commission, further reducing creators’ earnings. While the SuperStar program offers a slight commission reduction, it still doesn’t compete with the lower fees on alternative platforms. Furthermore, the absence of promotion for adult content creators could be a limitation for those in that niche.
Features And Ease Of Use
OnlyFans and LoyalFans are platforms catering to content creators, especially in the adult industry. OnlyFans, with over 2 million creators and 170 million users, is the more established platform. It has a subscription-based model with additional monetization options like direct payments and tips. LoyalFans, previously NexoCams, is relatively newer and caters to a broad range of content creators. Both platforms have user-friendly interfaces. OnlyFans offers promotional tools like discounted subscriptions and free trials. In comparison, LoyalFans has unique features like geoblocking, auto-tweeting, and personalized video shoutouts. Both platforms have messaging and content creation tools, but LoyalFans also offers live streaming.
Payment Terms And Earning Potential
On both OnlyFans and LoyalFans, creators keep 80% of their earnings, while the platforms retain 20%. OnlyFans allows creators to withdraw earnings once they accumulate $20, with customizable withdrawal frequencies (weekly, monthly, or biweekly). In contrast, LoyalFans has a minimum payout of $50 and pays twice a month. OnlyFans has the edge in earning potential due to its larger user base and brand recognition.
What We Like
OnlyFans boasts a substantial user base and brand recognition, making it a powerful platform for creators. Its lower minimum payout and customizable withdrawal frequency can be more appealing for some creators. LoyalFans, on the other hand, offers some unique features not found on OnlyFans, such as auto-tweeting, live streams, and personalized video shoutouts. Its geoblocking feature is more granular, allowing for blocking down to the state level, which might be advantageous for some creators.
What We Don’t Like
Despite its large user base, OnlyFans does not offer features like auto-tweeting, live streams, and personalized video shoutouts, which could be a limitation for some creators. Also, it only allows geoblocking by country. LoyalFans, while having some unique features, has a smaller user base compared to OnlyFans, which could limit earning potential. Additionally, its higher minimum payout and less flexible payment schedule could be inconvenient for some creators.
Features and Ease of Use
OnlyFans and FanHouse are both subscription-based platforms, allowing content creators to earn money by offering exclusive content to their subscribers. OnlyFans is known for its relatively lenient content guidelines, catering primarily to adult content. It has a large user base and is recognized for pushing boundaries. FanHouse, on the other hand, is more oriented towards PG-13 content and focuses on fostering a close-knit community. It’s ideal for creators seeking meaningful engagement with their audience. While OnlyFans can be likened to a bustling metropolis with more content freedom, FanHouse is akin to a cozy small town emphasizing quality interactions.
Payment Terms and Earning Potential
On OnlyFans, creators receive 80% of their earnings, with the platform taking a 20% commission. FanHouse, however, only takes a 10% commission, allowing creators to keep 90% of their earnings. This might make FanHouse more appealing in terms of earning potential. However, it’s worth mentioning that FanHouse is facing challenges in maintaining this commission rate due to transaction fees from the App Store, and there’s a possibility that this could change in the future
What We Like
OnlyFans stands out for offering content creators more freedom in the type of content they can produce, especially for those creating adult content. Its large user base also presents an opportunity for creators to reach a bigger audience. FanHouse is lauded for its lower commission rates (currently at 10%), as well as its focus on building a genuine and engaged community. It’s ideal for those who want to create safe-for-work content and value quality engagement with their audience.
What We Don’t Like
The downsides of OnlyFans include its higher commission rate of 20% and strong competition due to the large number of creators on the platform. For FanHouse, the cons include a smaller user base, which might limit audience reach. Also, its content guidelines are strict and can be limiting for creators who wish to produce a broader range of content. Additionally, the uncertainty surrounding FanHouse’s commission rate due to external factors like App Store fees is a concern.
Features And Ease Of Use
OnlyFans and FanCentro are both subscription-based platforms that cater primarily to content creators. OnlyFans is more established and simple to use, while FanCentro has a more extensive set of features. Signing up on both platforms is straightforward. On OnlyFans, setting your subscription price is all it takes to get started, while FanCentro may seem more intimidating initially due to the variety of features it offers. FanCentro also requires creators to manually enable access for subscribers, which might be slightly more work but provides an extra layer of control. Moreover, FanCentro has better discoverability for content creators due to its user-friendly browsing options, while OnlyFans relies on users knowing the content creators’ profile links.
Payment Terms And Earning Potential
On both OnlyFans and FanCentro, content creators retain 80% of their earnings while the platforms take a 20% cut. FanCentro, however, allows creators to set up different tiers of subscriptions and custom bundles, which could be more lucrative. While OnlyFans is a well-known brand, FanCentro compensates for its lesser brand recognition by helping creators be discovered organically through its robust browsing features. Regarding payout frequency, OnlyFans has a lower payout threshold of $20 and lets creators withdraw at any time, while FanCentro has minimum payout amounts that vary depending on the payout method.
What We Like
FanCentro shines with its variety of features, ease of discoverability for new creators, and options for different subscription tiers and custom bundles. It also provides content creators with tools for cross-promotion on other social media platforms and has a support site, CentroU, that offers tutorials and tips for maximizing earnings. FanCentro’s option to migrate content from an existing subscription platform is a standout feature for those looking to switch from another platform like OnlyFans.
What We Don’t Like
FanCentro’s manual process for managing subscribers could be cumbersome for some content creators. OnlyFans, being a much larger platform, has slower and less personalized support. Additionally, OnlyFans does not offer good browsing options for discovery, and its simplicity, while making it easy to use, also means it lacks some of the innovative features that FanCentro offers. The uncertainty regarding OnlyFans’ policy on adult content is also a concern.
Features And Ease Of Use
OnlyFans and Frisk Chat cater to content creators looking to monetize their content. OnlyFans is more established, but some creators find it harder to get approved. Frisk Chat, designed by content creators, is perceived to be more accessible for newcomers. A significant differentiator is discoverability; OnlyFans lacks a discover page or search engine, so creators must promote themselves externally. In contrast, Frisk Chat provides a discover page, an active models page, and categorization options for creators, making it easier for potential subscribers to find content that interests them. Additionally, Frisk Chat allows creators to have both paid and unpaid pages, targeting different audiences and offering a glimpse before commitment.
Payment Terms And Earning Potential
Frisk Chat has a minimum withdrawal threshold of $100 and charges a fee for withdrawing funds, which might not be suitable for some, especially when starting. On the other hand, OnlyFans has a lower withdrawal threshold of $20 and does not charge a fee, making it more desirable in this aspect. The earning potential on both platforms is generally dependent on the creator’s ability to attract subscribers.
What We Like
Frisk Chat is appealing for its ease of getting started and the discoverability features it offers, making it more accessible and promising for creators who are just starting or those who wish to be discovered through the platform. Having the option to maintain both paid and unpaid pages adds a layer of flexibility in how creators engage their audience. OnlyFans is attractive for its lower withdrawal threshold and absence of withdrawal fees, making it more convenient for accessing earnings.
What We Don’t Like
On Frisk Chat, the higher withdrawal threshold and fees on withdrawals can be problematic for some creators. OnlyFans falls short in the area of discoverability, relying solely on creators to promote themselves through external means, which can be a hindrance, especially for those who do not have an established following. Additionally, OnlyFans has been reported to have a more difficult approval process for new content creators.
These are only a select few, there are surely other platforms and others to come. We recommend to think thoroughly before choosing which platform to go with and to be honest – OnlyFans is probably the best place to start. After you’ve built a following and want to branch out, maybe try a more feature rich place then you’re more than welcome to venture out and explore.
But for starters – go where the people (and money) are.
And if you do, Give Supercreator OnlyFans AI tools a try. Our tools and products are designed to help you grow and promote your OnlyFans account with metrics and analytics. With our powerful tools, you can streamline your chatting workflow, prioritize high-spending fans, and optimize your PPV pricing. SuperCreator also offers pre-made scripts for engaging conversations and targeted pricing for mass PPVs.
As of 2023 the differences in price are negligible and having lower commissions is not the main consideration. Patreon, Unlocked.me and Fanhouse have lowered fees but we highly recommend of taking the existing fanbase as a main consideration
It is really a question of what you want to achieve and who you want to reach out to. Do your research and make sure you answer all of the questions listed in the beginning of the article before you decide.
Patreon, Fansly, Manyvids and Unlocked.me are some notable platforms you might want to check. It really depends on how you build your content strategy.
Benefits of using an OnlyFans alternative include more lenient content policies, alignment with your target audience, different features and monetization options, potentially lower fees, diversification of your online presence, and sometimes a stronger community feel or better customer support.
Hey there, content creators and fans! Buckle up for a David and Goliath battle – OnlyFans and Unlockd.me. Let’s see which one steals the show,
As the world has evolved, content creation, particularly in the adult industry, has transformed into a lucrative venture. Creators are no longer being slut-shamed but
Hey there, content creators and fans! Buckle up for a David and Goliath battle – OnlyFans and Unlockd.me. Let’s see which one steals the show,
Hey there!! Are you a content creator looking for a platform to showcase your fabulous work and make some serious cash? Well, buckle up, because
In the never-ending quest for internet fame and fortune, content creators have discovered new platforms to showcase their talents (and other assets). OnlyFans and Just
Are you a content creator looking to monetize your content and connect with your fans? With so many options available, it can be difficult to
Choosing the right platform to showcase and monetize your work can be a game-changer for your success. So, let’s talk about two popular options: OnlyFans
Hey there, fabulous creators! 👋 Are you ready for a sizzling, detailed comparison between the fan platform titans, OnlyFans and Fansly? Buckle up, because we’re
Hailed by many as the benchmark of independent adult models platforms, OnlyFans is a household name (well, depending which household 😉). But in recent years
Product
Email: hello@supercreator.app
Feel free to reach us through the chat on our website or email.
by Creators